Thumbnail

Building Muscle Slowlyby Brad PilonThis post was created simply because I was feeling sorry for myself this morning.I wasn’t making any gains. Lifting weights was stupid. All I was doing was maintaining – complete waste of my time.(Yes, I was being a baby)So I took my measurements… then compared them to all of my older measurements.At first, it looked like I had confirmed my suspicion – no growth ever!  …But on further inspection I realized that I had been making slow but steady improvements all along.I then pulled out the records of my DEXA scans at plugged them into a new row…As you can see, I was mistaken –  Slow but steady gains, slow but steady improvements in my circumferences.This is why we keep measurements – because without measurements we are just guessing. And weight on its own is a terrible way to measure progress… On each and every one of these measurement days I weighed somewhere between 170 and 180 pounds, but weight fluctuates so much it’s really not a valuable measurement tool unless it is accompanied by your circumference measurements.So lesson learned -Our eyes (and emotions) can deceive us… don’t trust them Over the last 3+ years with Eat Stop Eat, How Much Protein and Adonis Styled Workouts  I’ve been slowly adding muscle 5 pounds of muscle makes a big difference. I’ve managed to keep my body fat levels fairly stable (as measured by DEXA and my waist circumference)

Link:

Building Muscle Slowly | Brad Pilon's 'Eat Blog Eat'

Be Nice and Share!

A little over 7 weeks has gone by since my dreadful DXA scan.If you remember, it was the scan that ended my brilliantly thought-out  7 week experiment of “what would happened if I stopped training and stopped fasting?”.Nothing good happened in that experiment – I lost 7 pounds of muscle and gained 5 pounds of fat.But now, I’m back in form.And I’m going to take this opportunity to really explore the importance of knowing your body. Specifically, I want to talk about the importance of knowing your measurements.Most people know their weight… some even guess at their body fat, but it’s still the minority of people who actually track their measurements…. which isn’t a good thing.Case in point – It’s been about 7 weeks of fasting and training, and my weight hasn’t changed…at all.  It has fluctuated between 174-176 for the last 7 weeks. Which would drive me absolutely crazy, except I know my measurements.

Original article – 

Gain Muscle, Lose Fat (just a guess) | Brad Pilon's 'Eat Blog Eat'

Be Nice and Share!

Yesterday the nightly news in Canada aired with a segment on Intermittent Fasting, and your truly was in it.You can watch the clip below.This was a great eye opener for me as it reminded me that even after all these years, it’s the most basic anti-fasting scaremongering that is still the most prevalent.Back in 2007 when Eat Stop Eat was first published dispelling the myth of muscle loss while fasting was the major topic of the book. Since then the book has expanded, and in the fitness world ‘muscle loss’ is rarely brought up as a side effect of fasting anymore. But this television segment was a great reminder that to people first coming across Intermittent Fasting, this is still the major concern.And it’s not just Intermittent Fasting.It’s the most basic concerns that still hold back most of Health and Fitness.High Protein –> But what about your Kidneys? Squats –> But what about your knees

Read this article: 

Intermittent fasting on television | Brad Pilon's 'Eat Blog Eat'

Be Nice and Share!
Thumbnail

Let’s start with the most obvious question first – What is metabolism?The amount of calories you burn in a day is a result of the millions of chemical reactions that occur in your body in order to sustain life. We measure the amount of energy that is used by our bodies in either Calories or Joules, both are really nothing more than simple measures of heat energy.This ‘calorie cost of metabolism’ is what we refer to as your metabolic rate – simply how many calories you burned in a given period of time. This is what most people are thinking of when they say ‘metabolism’ – the amount of calories you burn in any given day.Now here is where it gets really interesting: The metabolic rates in different parts of your body are not all the same. Some parts of your body need more calories than others because they are more ‘metabolically active’

This article: 

Ideal Metabolism | Brad Pilon's 'Eat Blog Eat'

Be Nice and Share!
Thumbnail

As a follow up to my last post, here is my guide explaining if you should be bulking overeating eating more or dieting… AKA how to make the BMI kind of useful.***Truth be told, I dislike the word ‘bulking’ and even ‘overeating’.  The real question should be: ‘are you eating enough to build muscle’, but for the sake sanity I’m going to use bulking and overeating in this post…but you know what I mean***Not everyone should bulk, I hope I made that perfectly clear in my last blog post.However, I hope the fact that some people can eat more  was equally clear.So how do you tell if you should be eating more or dieting (or somewhere in between)?Simple, you borrow a whole heap of info from the Adonis Index.Firstly, lets look at your Lean Body Mass – The amount of lean mass you can carry (and thus muscle mass you can carry)  is largely dependent on your height.This is the Adonis Equation for predicting the possible range of Lean Body Mass a person is likely to carry at any given height:Lean mass (kg) = C x H3.2Where H is your height in meters and C is the coefficient we use to account for age.The standard deviation is roughly 0.5.OK now for “C” use the following numbers:If you are between 20-24 use 11 If you are between 25 and 34 use 10.9, if you are between 35 and 44 use 10.7 If you are 45 and older  use 10.5 So using myself as an example:I’m 5’10? or 70 inches tall.To get your height in meters simply multiply your height in inches (70) by 0.0254.In my case I get 1.778(if you are lazy just go to Google and type “how tall is X inches in meters?”)Plugging my height into the equation and using the Coefficient for my age (10.7) I get the following:10.7 x 1.7783.2Now for the standard deviations – if we add or subtract 2 standard deviations from C then we get the lean mass for roughly 95% of the population of 5’10? guys.So for my height there is a 95% chance my lean body mass is somewhere between:9.7 x 1.7783.2  –  11.7 x 1.7783.2orSomewhere between 61.17 KG and 73.8 KG. Since I’m Canadian and for some weird reason still think of body weight in pounds, this would be:134.5 and 162 pounds of Lean Body Mass.OK, so now we know that realistically 162 pounds would be a best case scenario for 35 year old me. At 10% body fat that would be a body weight of about 180 pounds,  which would be pretty darn impressive on my frame.However, I’m NOT 180 pounds at 10% body fat

Continue reading: 

My Guide to Eating for Muscle | Brad Pilon's 'Eat Blog Eat'

Be Nice and Share!