pimg class=”alignright” title=”Wheat” src=”http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg158/MDA2008/MDA%202011/wheat.jpg” alt=”wheat” width=”319″ height=”283″ /I#8217;ve long suspected that everyone has emsome/em degree of sensitivity to gluten, even if they#8217;ve never been formally diagnosed and even if they don#8217;t notice any overt symptoms after eating it. Now we have concrete evidence that non-celiac gluten sensitivity actually exists. A recent a title=”Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity Diagnosed by Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Challenge: Exploring a New Clinical Entity.” href=”http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22825366″ target=”_blank”study/a, which I highlighted in Weekend Link Love, confirmed the existence of non-celiac wheat sensitivity. Subjects without the atrophied villi (tiny projects that line the intestines and help absorb nutrients) characteristic of celiac and without positive tests for various markers that indicate celiac experienced gluten-related symptoms after a blinded wheat challenge. It doesn#8217;t give us much of a clue as to the emprevalence/em of sensitivity, but it establishes that such a thing might exist among the general population./p
pspan id=”more-30978″/spanIt#8217;s not even the only study. It#8217;s just […]
Original post by Mark Sisson
Filed under: Uncategorized