pimg class=”alignright” title=”Tomatoes” src=”http://i247.photobucket.com/albums/gg158/MDA2008/MDA%202011/tomatoes.jpg” alt=”tomatoes” width=”320″ height=”212″ /Even if you can get folks to begrudgingly admit that organic foods tends to a title=”Is Organic a Scam? – Fetal and Child Development and Antibiotic Resistance ” href=”http://www.marksdailyapple.com/is-organic-a-scam-fetal-and-child-development-and-antibiotic-resistance/”contain fewer pesticide residues than conventional/a (and that this might even impact a person#8217;s health or the way a child develops), they#8217;ll dig in their heels when it comes to the nutritional content. And why shouldn#8217;t they? Organic isn#8217;t really em/emabout getting more vitamins, minerals, or other nutrients; it#8217;s always been about getting vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients emwithout/em the conventional pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides that so often accompany conventional produce. The presupposition that proponents of organic produce claim it contains more nutrients is a bit of a straw man, as that claim is rarely #8211; if ever #8211; made./p
pBut what if that mythological claim actually held a kernel of truth? I mean, now that […]
Original post by Mark Sisson
Filed under: Fitness